Whatchama-Called
“I feel called to serve in the youth ministry” . . . “My wife and I feel called to a different church” . . . “I felt called into ministry at an early age” . . . “I feel called to talk to you about this.”
This kind of language about feeling called, feeling led, feeling drawn by God to a particular ministry, task, or direction is quite common among Christians. You probably hear it often. You probably say it yourself from time to time. But have you ever stopped to ask yourself whether such an idea of an internal subjective feeling of being called to some place, thing, or task is biblical? Have you ever wondered whether your feelings about God calling you may, in fact, be your own personal desires, wishes, longings, ambitions, or pursuits?
It may startle you to learn that nowhere in the Bible do we find an example of a person “feeling called” by God without an external, verifiable call. Most often when the Bible talks about God’s calling, it refers to the call to repentance, salvation, or covenant faithfulness—a general call to all, though it is often coupled with God’s sovereign call of election, or choosing (Isaiah 48:12; Jer 7:13; Matt 22:14; Rom 8:28–30; 9:24; and many more). Thus, Paul wrote in 2 Thessalonians 2:14, “It was for this He called you through our gospel, that you may gain the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ.”
Another kind of calling in the Bible came in the form of an audible (and sometimes even visible) calling from God to a particular task or ministry. Abraham’s calling to the land of Canaan was audible, visible, and repeated (Heb 11:8). Moses’s call came audibly from a burning bush (Exod 3:4). The calling of Bezalel to the task of crafting the tabernacle in the wilderness came by an audible call from God through Moses (Exod 31:1–6). And who could forget Samuel’s repeated call by God in 1 Samuel 3:2–11, where the voice was so clear that he thought it was that of his master, Eli, nearby. Similarly, Paul’s call to be an apostle (Rom 1:1) was no inner conviction or nagging desire to serve, but a brilliant encounter with the resurrected Lord Jesus Christ Himself on the road to Damascus (Acts 9:1–18).
Another type of call—a bit more subtle, but genuine—came from the Holy Spirit through the official leaders of the Christian community. This official call by the Church was accompanied by an official appointment, usually marked by the laying on of hands. Acts 13:2–4 gives a good example of this kind of authentic call to ministry. As the official leaders of the church were gathered together, praying and fasting, the Holy Spirit said, “Set apart for Me Barnabas and Saul for the work to which I have called them” (Acts 13:2). In response to this word from the Lord, the leaders of the church appointed Barnabas and Saul to their ministries, laying hands on them and praying for them, which was a common means of ordination to ministry in the ancient world.
Whether or not Saul and Barnabas “felt” called to this ministry was irrelevant. Certainly, Paul had earlier experienced a dramatic conversion and received a general call directly from the mouth of Christ, but the specific “where” and “when” of the call were still being discovered. Perhaps Paul and Barnabas had inner yearnings to pursue that particular ministry from Antioch; or maybe they had been resisting the idea. But their personal feelings really weren’t decisive. Instead, the Holy Spirit called these men and revealed His will through the patient, prayerful, and wise discernment of the leadership and community in which they were ministering day to day. Whether the Holy Spirit spoke audibly, we can not know for sure. But we do know that the Holy Spirit spoke through the leadership and the community, that is, through the Church.
So, how does a person discern a calling into ministry, a call by God to a particular task? This is not an easy question to answer, but I can trace the contours of what this should look like. First and foremost, a Christian should be aware of his or her general call to holy living and Christian testimony, the call all believers have by virtue of being called to salvation through Jesus Christ (1 Cor 7:15; Gal 5:13; 2 Thess 2:14). This includes a call to walk in newness of life, to love the brethren, and to proclaim Christ near and far. It implies a committed relationship to the Church universal and local, to build up the body of Christ through humble service, to give and live sacrificially. These things constitute the clear calling to which all Christians are to respond daily. They require no special recommendation or invitation, but they do, of course, require constant reminders and repeated exhortations. We too quickly forget the calling to which we are all called!
Second, the biblical pattern of calling to specific ministries or tasks involved either an audible (and often repeated) call from God, or an official invitation by legitimate spiritual leadership confirmed by the Church community. In the Old Testament this kind of call came through the God-appointed prophets, priests, and kings. In the New Testament it came through the pastors, elders, teachers, and leadership within the worshiping and praying community of the Church or even through the counsel of wise, mature, and trusted brothers and sisters in Christ.
For the last decade or so I have generally lived by a maxim that was advocated by an old professor of mine, who is now, remarkably, a colleague. He probably doesn’t even remember saying it, but it made a great impression on me. In the context of questions about God’s leading and calling, he said, “I don’t do anything I’m not asked to do.” At that moment I believed those words. I ran through the instances of callings and commands in the Bible and realized it fit quite nicely. So I abandoned the typical approach of “I feel called” and decided that my personal feelings on the matter would be the last and least of my criteria for determining God’s will for me. If God wants me to do something, He will call me as He called those in the Bible—through the wise, prayerful guidance and shepherding of His ordained leaders and through the Spirit-filled community. When I finally accepted this biblical approach to calling, I felt liberated. No longer would I have to worry about missing God’s call, misunderstanding His call, aggressively pursuing opportunities, sending out resumes, competing for positions. God would call in His timing and by His own means. This doesn’t mean we remain passive. The general calling of the Christian to loving, serving, and living the Christian life will keep us all busy as we await His various specific calls to particular tasks. But this perspective does mean we aren’t constantly on the hunt for bigger and better opportunities, as if ministry were a competitive career field in which our primary goal is to get ahead. Nor does this mean that we say “yes” to every leader’s whim or friend’s request. Nobody can do everything, but all of us are called to do something.
The idea of “feeling called” to the ministry, “feeling called” to a task, “feeling called” to a particular place—this idea of feeling called to anything has become far too common in Christian parlance. It must stop. It is not biblical. And it can be absolutely disastrous. How many people have gone into ministry or into the mission field because they felt called. How many leaders and church communities have accepted such people because they felt they could not counter a personal calling from God? Don’t misunderstand me. A person may feel compelled, gifted, even “called” to ministry, but unless that urge and desire is confirmed by God’s chosen means of calling and sending from His community through the Holy Spirit, the feelings should never be the sole—nor even the primary—basis for action. In many cases (perhaps in most), our personal feelings on the matter are completely irrelevant.

13 comments:
Mike,
Thanks for saying this. Our feelings are fickle. I've been thinking about this for several years now. I learned a valuable lesson in the military: during a mission, if you know the commander's intent and the goal he wants accomplished, how you accomplish it is sometimes up to you - as a participant and co-creator. His mission as I understand it is for us to be His witnesses on this earth, proclaiming His dominion over creation, in a sacrosanct covenental relationship with Him, for His glory. I am called to serve Christ for His glory - the general. The specifics are not yet determined. It's not a shepherding role, but rather prophetic - but not in the charismatic sensational way at all. Quite the opposite. It is the sense of understanding the Church in America as a whole and its entanglements with certain elements of our culture. Anyways, I'm not sure I have made any sense. Perhaps this blog isn't the place to put forth these things...
Dr. Svigel,
I appreciate your courage to write this. I hear this language all the time and have found it to be quite unhelpful and even harmful to the church.
Great stuff. I, too, have wondered for quite a while how the whole "calling" works. I appreciate your insight, and think this will help me as I approach graduation.
like the commenter before me, i too have wondered how the whole "calling" thing works. i've been aware of how it doesn't work (feeling?) for quite some time, but your thoughts have brought some clarity to this for me...to something that has at times been a struggle for me in ministry.
Thanks Michael, a very helpful post. I've always thought that we neglect the formation dimension of the various decisions we must make - the idea that God uses the circumstances to shape and form us into his image, rather than the idea that there is the one person, or one job the secret to which I must uncover somewhere. Waiting for the 'sign' we end up allowing the passage of time to make the decision for us. Then there's the community dimension of decisions we must make. So as James said in Acts 15:25 'it seemed good to the Holy Spirit, and to us...
thanks again
I believe when people say they "feel" a call, they are often using the word to mean something different from mere emotion. I think the problem is in language and the elastic use of "feeling" in our culture. It's, to me, the same as saying something is "in" the text. "In" is another overused word.
Although it's an easy out and a way to abdicate responsibility, I would be loathe to trust the leadership of a church over my own sense of repeated signs and communications from God that I should follow a particular path. Noah built his ark on his own. Like him, how could I place the collective thought of human leadership in a flawed and fallen world over a communication from God? I might test the leading from God with the advice and queries of my religious community, but as an Anabaptist, I would follow what I discerned was God's will in cooperation with the community (or if necessary, but a challenge to the community). I also don't think you need to hear a "voice" to get a call. I do think you have to be immersed in the Bible and prayer.
But my main point is that I have seem church leadership so often so blinded by the fashions and ideologies of the world that I can't trust them to discern God's will for my life.
Dear Dr.Svigel,
I find this to be a very perseptive writen post; BUT, if we ponder for just a moment...go directly to our scriptures written; there are many types and forms of God's direction that imply how "Leadership fails" in their decisions and direction; as well as God retreaves wisdom from the "wise and the learned" due too their own poor discretions, as well "as NOT obiding by Gods sound doctrine" of His written words too begin with-at all. It actually can be a "No brainer" at times in my opinion to see a so called community disrepect God, and His Integrity as well as the Leadership in pretending advances too "not hear or listen" to God's direction themselves....and what it was He really said. If at all in Our Churches...they, themselves can not obide by His word; than , how possibly can we trust their discernments for their direction and advancements for His Church? "SOMETIMES.....God uses the small too bring forth direction and His Holy Spirit at all"-"which intails the weak and the small....of a congregation". Not the "Hi"!! My name is in the bullentin this weekend thing we see going on. Who is too say that the individuals in working positions within the Church were even called directly from The God Head Himself or it's congregation? Sometimes , it takes times of tribulations too recify Gods Discerning Direction; and NOT of others that perhaps call themselves Gods choosen for that mission involved. Yipes.. Gracious Prayer-Great discernments-unfolding moments of Gods prompting of Kings and Rulers; as well as His conscious awareness and humblenesses of bringing trials before great men--it exists it does Yes! Discernment=A ministry all by itself...with The Holy Spirits promptings and Love Given! yep "R"
There have been some GREAT responses to this entry. I'm impressed and proud. I agree that leadership fails us . . . miserably. Just because somebody with a title before his name tells me what to do, it doesn't mean we do it. Even if they are good, trustworthy, and respected. Personally, I look for a pattern or "constellation" of prodding, poking, calling, and confirming. That's what I mean. But that's completely different than individual Christians rubber-stamping their own personal desires with the mark of the Holy Spirit. That's the error I'm trying to avoid...
Dr. Svigel,
May I ask what professor told you that he never did anything he wasn't asked to do?
Diane,
You wrote: "I would be loathe to trust the leadership of a church over my own sense of repeated signs and communications from God that I should follow a particular path."
I'm curious. Help me understand how you can be so absolutely sure that you have the ability to receive direct revelation from God, and interpret without error that which you hear. I think I understand if what you mean by "signs and communications" is the Scripture, but if that's not what you mean then I am wondering how you are able to have such certainty when it comes to hearing from God. My wife can say something to me and I think I understand what she is saying, but it turns out I was completely wrong in my interpretation of her "revelation" to me. I'm just not that confident in humanity's ability to receive direct revelation from God and our ability to interpret it with any amount of certainty as we are part of that flawed and fallen creation. It seems that we are hesitant to listen to the community because of their fallenness or lack of judgment but then very quick to declare that we are personally able to discern, with certainty, what God is saying to us. It just doesn't work like that.
This is a good question, Jeffrey. I too share a worry about claims of direct correspondence with God. I don't say God can't do this. He works miracles and can trump His normal way of doing things at any time. But my kids have asked me several times, "Papa, why doesn't God talk to us?" I have gotten to the point now where I ask them to answer that themselves. The answer goes like this: Because if God was in the habit of talking to individuals personally and privately, without some pretty amazing confirming signs and wonders to prove their revelations are really from God, then it opens the floodgates for ANYBODY to CLAIM they have heard from God and to say pretty much anything they want in His name. But, in a world in which God speaks only to a select few and verifies their prophetic authority through fulfilled prophecies and signs/wonders/miracles, while remaining relatively silent with non-prophets, then He is able to safeguard the channels of His divine revelation. It becomes quite simple---if a person is not a verified prophet, we have no reason to listen to their so-called messages from God. My kids have gotten this figured out, and they understand the absolute chaos that would ensue if God spoke to all kinds of people all the time, with no way to verify it to the community. So, I agree. On the other hand, I do want to clarify that I do not believe it is just one thing (ordained leaders) or another thing (the community) that is authoritative. God reveals His will through all sorts of means---circumstances, experiences, counsel of others, callings by those in authority, and, yes, our own feelings. But as far as official calls and appointments to ministries in and out of the church, we can not change the biblical accounts---either a verifiable encounter with the Lord (like Paul, Peter, etc.), through our godly response to circumstances (as Paul being led to and away from certain regions in his evangelism), or through the ordination to particular ministries by the church through the laying on of hands. In these cases one can say the Spirit "spoke" through these things, but in a less subjective and more verifiable way. At least, that's my current view of the matter. I'm interested in any additional discussion...
[P.S. the prof was Lanier Burns.]
I am an ordained minister who has felt the call of God to proclaim His Gospel. It was all confirmed when I went before the presbytery, passed the examinations, was ordained and installed in the local church, and began in what I thought would be a life-long call to ministry. That was 3 years ago. There was a specific time in 1996 where I thought God was calling me to the ministry. I sought counsel and prepared and even fought it. I suppose I did come in kicking and screaming. Now I am not so sure. The past three years have been difficult where some have questioned my calling and gifts to the ministry in the first place. At least one was one of the persons who laid hands on me at that ordination. As of now, the leadership of my own church is not the confirming and calling body it used to be. Without the confirmation of the call to the ministry from the leadership of my own church, what am I to do? I am re-visiting everything once again. But i also must recongnize that it is really Christ who calls me. My situation seems to be one where the Caller and His appointed shepherds are in conflict or where they actually agree and I am some how delusional. Either way, Satan is having a good laugh at it. I pray that part ends soon.
Neil:
This is a great question. I tend to view calling and appointment to calling as task-specific. Even though we are "called" to ministry in general, the specifics of that calling will change throughout our lives. This change is never fun, and in our world they usually end up being painful. I don't know a lot about your specific situation, but I don't think reconsidering specific ministry positions is necessarily wrong. We just had several pastors/ministers in our local church called to other places for ministry, leaving us almost pastorless. That doesn't seem to have worked out well for our local church, but God, for His own purposes, has us in this condition. All that to say, God's sovereign plan doesn't always make sense. I will be praying for you during this struggle, especially that God will reveal His path for you. If you want to chat about this, call.
Post a Comment