Where Do I Sign?
Four and a half years as a legal assistant at least taught me to read the fine print before I sign anything. But if "An Evangelical Manifesto" mentioned here asserts what I think it does, it will echo many of my same frustrations with evangelical perpetrators and victims of right-wing politics—the same frustrations, I have noticed, that are shared by many of my own thirty-something generation of evangelical theologians, pastors, and lay-people.
Here’s how I’ve generally sized up the situation as it has developed over the last couple of decades: Many American evangelicals have been duped by a simple equivocation of the word “conservative.” They have assumed that being a conservative Christian was the same as being a Christian conservative. That is, so many evangelicals act as though being conservative theologically and morally obligated them to being conservative socially, politically, and fiscally. They had to engage in conservative foreign policy, conservative environmental policy, conservative economic policy, conservative immigration policy, conservative everything. But this is simply uncritical rubbish . . . an excuse for not having to actually think through issues. They have been far too willing to be told what to believe about political issues by people like Rush Limbaugh or Sean Hannity.
I think biblically faithful Christians have made major mistakes here. They have blindly engaged in narrow-issue politics, finding themselves unquestioningly supporting a party that would affirm their pro-life, anti-gay agendas with heartless vigor. But what about the poor? What about the suffering? What about the outcasts? What about the sick? What about sharing the truth in love? When our political combat becomes an excuse for neglecting Christ-like love of the helpless and hopeless, we’ve gone way too far. I’ve actually been told by a fellow evangelical scholar that he applies Christ’s admonition to care for the poor by voting Republican! The argument goes like this: Republicans lower taxes . . . lower taxes stimulate economic growth . . . economic growth promotes job growth . . . job growth leads to higher pay . . . higher pay rescues the poor from poverty. Wow.
Over the last twenty years or so evangelicals have spent millions of dollars either defending or promoting Christian convictions in the political arena—Congress, the Courts, the White House. But I hate to think how many individuals have been alienated by the political wing of the evangelical subculture . . . and how many souls have been lost in the process. Have evangelicals unwisely diverted too much time, money, and personnel from advancing the words and works of the Gospel? I think it’s worth considering.
I’m looking forward to reading the "Manifesto," I doubt it will satisfy my current concerns without sparking new ones, but I suspect it will hit the mark close enough for many of us to finally breathe a sigh of relief.

5 comments:
Mike,
Your comments are helpful. I've been thinking about the same things for a while now. I think one of the problems is that the Church has involved itself more with political reform than social reform. We have allied ourself mainly with one particular political ideology, and therefore have surrendered the prophetic voice of the Church to that ideology. For example, there was virtually no response from the evangelical community regarding the Iraq war, and whether it was just. It was because 'our guy' was in office. The Church slept. Darfur is another example. If the Church cried from the rooftops and directed resources towards ending that problem, I think it would end. And we don't have to fight it politically. As a social movement, the Church can seek justice and work to stop oppression.
One area I have been thinking about a long time is capitalism. It is virtually accepted by everyone in such an uncritical fashion. Anyone who critiques it is seen as 'liberal' or 'Marxist' or a 'Leftist.' So, it goes on without any criticism from the evangelical community. The question, however, is whether capitalism is, in principle, Bible-based. I think that a close reading of the Scriptures reveals economic principles that are in stark contrast to the capitalism as we know it today. Capitalism's hold on our culture is one of the fundamental problems with American Christianity.
Other issues worth mentioning are issues of gender, poverty, environmental stewardship, and war. I'm not a pacifist. That is unrealistic in today's world. But that should not mean that American Christians should uncritically support war just because our President, whom most of us voted for, says its what we must do. I think that the prophetic voice of the Church mandates us to use that voice to fight injustice, oppression, and violence that is unnecessary.
Great to hear from you, Sean. I think you bring up some of the areas that need to be revisited more critically and more balanced. We have let politics and economics shelf our theology, rather than let our theology define our approaches to these issues. By the way, the document itself is now available at www.evangelicalmanifesto.org.
By the way, call me sometime.
Hi Dr. Svigel,
Maybe I haven't looked hard enough yet, but I still haven't seen where the Bible tells us to help the poor by taking from those who have and giving it to those who have not (i.e. wealth redistribution). I would almost be tempted to consider that to be theft and/or robbery, which I'm pretty sure the Bible condemns. As such, I'm still having a little trouble with the notion that an Evangelical can be faithful to the Bible, and to leftist social and economic policies at the same time. There's a lot that the Bible seems to say on these things that goes against the typical leftist platitudes that are used to try to convince Christians that "helping the poor" and "caring for the environment" necessarily means supporting a socialistic agenda.
On the other hand, I don't think the Bible supports trans-national corporate capitalism either.
I don't think as a Church we have seriously examined the effects of capitalism on a world-wide scale. I am not saying that every capitalistic enterprise is oppressive. What I am saying as that a critique of capitalism is virtually nonexistent in the American Church. Therefore, I don't think the Church should be aligning itself with one particular political party because it will undermine our prophetic voice.
Tim:
No, the Bible doesn't talk about redistribution of wealth in a communistic or socialistic sense. But again, this kind of approach is exactly what the Manifesto is against. It challenges both the far right and far left politicizing of Christian ethics. The Bible DOES say that those who have been blessed with much are responsible to provide for the poor, the widows, the orphans voluntarily. A politicizing of this social mandate for Christians would take the form you mention. But this takes the whole heart and spirit out of benevolent acts. But again, I see far too much selfishness, greed, envy, and just plain laziness among evangelical Christians today when it comes to a use of their financial blessing. I wonder if rabid capitalism and the "pursuit of happiness" at all costs has brainwashed Christians into thinking they really do deserve the treasures they keep accumulating... I don't call this kind of critique of the sin of greed socialism. I call it Christian.
Post a Comment