Be Taught . . . Be Stable
Is the Bible difficult to understand?
Yes and no.
Around AD 185, Irenaeus of Lyons wrote, “The entire Scriptures, the prophets, and the Gospels, can be clearly, unambiguously, and harmoniously understood by all, although all do not believe them” (Against Heresies 2.27.3). But that famous pastor was describing a particular kind of student who was “devoted to piety and the love of truth,” who would “eagerly meditate upon those things which God has . . . subjected to our knowledge.” Such a student of Scripture would “make advancement in acquaintance with them, rendering the knowledge of them easy to him by means of daily study” (2.27.1). The flip side of this is that the impious, the lazy, and those who fail to accept the limitations of our knowledge would not achieve even the basic level of proficiency in his or her understanding of the Bible.
Over a hundred years earlier, the apostle Peter gave us a similar warning about understanding Scripture. With reference to Paul’s writings, he said, “Some things [are] hard to understand, which the untaught and unstable distort, as they do also the rest of the Scriptures, to their own destruction” (2 Peter 3:16).
How do we avoid becoming like those Scripture Twisters who wound verses of the Bible into a spiritual hangman’s noose? Peter painted a clear picture of them, and we ought to listen to his warning.
Untaught and Unstable
Peter said the “untaught” and “unstable” twisted Paul’s writings to their destruction. The Greek word translated “untaught” is the literal opposite of “discipled.” A discipled person was an apprentice who learned from a teacher over the course of several years. Thus, Peter said that one way to be a Scripture Twister was to be untaught by a teacher. The implication is clear: only those who have been trained can be expected to skillfully weave passages of Scripture together into a unified whole centered on Christ and faithfully representing the pattern of Christian truth. Paul called this skill “accurately handling the word of truth” (2 Timothy 2:15). Peter also described Scripture Twisters as “unstable.” They were ungrounded, off kilter, “tipsy.” Picture the difference between a trailer house standing on cinder blocks and a building resting on bedrock. The unstable were like reeds in the wind, waving to and fro with the changing winds.
What was true in Peter’s day has never changed. Today untaught and unstable people distort the Scriptures, often unknowingly. They misread and misunderstand the Bible because they lack the patience, the humility, or the endurance to pass from spiritual infancy to adulthood, from the rank of novice to the rank of master. Yet they rest their bad theology and practice on the Bible and claim to be masters and teachers of things they don’t really understand (1 Timothy 1:7). They scoff at authority, reject tradition, and throw out the perspectives of other believers. All the while they claim “the Bible alone” as their only source of authority, not realizing that they naively read into the Bible their own inaccurate ideas.
In light of Peter’s warning, Bible-believing Christians need to be particularly cautious about how we read the Bible . . . and how we tell others to read it. For example, I recently read a book suggesting that if my Bible has study notes I ought to throw it away and get a blank Bible to read with fresh eyes . . . the teacher’s notes might twist my thinking! For another example: how many times have you been advised not to consult commentaries until you’ve come up with our own, personal interpretation? In light of Peter’s warning, I can’t help but read such exhortations as encouraging Christians to be “untaught.”
Peter would not have approved.
Am I saying that we should stop reading our Bibles on our own? No. But I am saying we should never read our Bibles in isolation. Taking personal initiative to read and study Scripture is right. But rejecting training and accountability with others as we read the Bible is wrong.
Be Taught . . . Be Stable
What, then, are we to do to handle the Bible accurately? Peter has already given us the answer: be taught and be stable. But how? By submitting to the teaching of the Holy Spirit working through His gifted teachers in the Spirit-indwelled community. We often appeal to the Holy Spirit’s direct, individual, personal work in our hearts to teach us (John 16:13). But this is only half the truth. The New Testament emphasizes over and over that the Spirit not only indwells individuals (1 Corinthians 6:19), making them responsive to the truth (1 Corinthians 2:14), but the Spirit also indwells the church (1 Corinthians 3:16), promoting the faithful teaching of the truth. This corporate model of how we are to be taught and be stable through the working of the Body of Christ is most clearly expressed in Ephesians 4:11–16.
And He gave some as apostles, and some as prophets, and some as evangelists, and some as pastors and teachers, for the equipping of the saints for the work of service, to the building up of the body of Christ; until we all attain to the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to a mature man, to the measure of the stature which belongs to the fullness of Christ. As a result, we are no longer to be children, tossed here and there by waves, and carried about by every wind of doctrine, by the trickery of men, by craftiness in deceitful scheming; but speaking the truth in love, we are to grow up in all aspects into Him, who is the head, even Christ, from whom the whole body, being fitted and held together by that which every joint supplies, according to the proper working of each individual part, causes the growth of the body for the building up of itself in love.Did you catch all the ingredients for being taught and being stable? Learning under gifted teachers . . . being fitted together . . . each individual playing a part . . . growing from childhood to adulthood . . . attaining the unity of the faith. Instead of throwing out my study Bible, I ought to let it fill the gaps in my knowledge. Instead of making commentaries my last ditch effort, I should learn from godly scholars. Rather than reinventing the wheel or seeking out the latest fad, I should explore the rich heritage of Christians who have come before me. And rather than leaning on my own personal understanding, I ought to glean what I can from the insights of other believers around me.
If we want to avoid becoming Scripture Twisters, we need to balance our personal Bible reading with community study under gifted teachers. Only in the context of a Bible-believing community led by trained and gifted leaders, we will become taught and stable teachers of Scripture, “accurately handling the word of truth.”

8 comments:
Dr. Svigel,
Do you think that we have the liberty to generalize Jesus' words to the disciples in Jn 14? In other words, when he tells them that the Spirit will teach them all things, is he telling us that as well?
Jeffrey:
That's a great question. I do read this text that way, but I do so in a qualified sense. I believe the apostles did have a special, infallible manifestation of hte Spirit that granted them special apostolic/prophetic authority. So, they quite literally were guided into all truth (John 16:13)---often new truth previously unrevealed---and they really were told "things to come" (16:13) in a prophetic sense. But as I look at John 14-16 and the various works of the Holy Spirit that are said to be given when the Spirit comes upon the disciples, I see the same kinds of ministries extended to the church as a whole. Thus, in John 14:16-17, the Spirit of truth is promised to the disciples. He dwells with them, but will be in them (14:17). This is the same promise extended to all who believe through the apostles in both an individual sense and a corporate sense (1 Cor 3 and 6). In the same way, I see a similar pattern of the Spirit teaching the apostles all things (John 14:26) in a special way, but also in a general way the Spirit---through His gifting pastors, evangelists, teachers, etc. for the work of the ministry (1 Cor 12-14, Eph 4, etc.). So, because it's the same Spirit sent to accomplish the same things, I think there is reason to extend the same promise to the church, but not through the apostolic/prophetic offices (which I believe were first century and historically foundational offices (Eph 2:20; 4:11). Also, I believe the "truth" to which the Spirit leads through the gifted community is basic orthodoxy---that is, the proper confession of the person and work of Christ, the "fundamentals" of the faith. I don't see this as a promise that the Spirit will lead each individaul believer into fully understanding the proper interpretation of every verse of the Bible. But I do rely on the truth-giving work of the Spirit to lead believers toward fundamental orthodoxy and away from gross error and heresy. I think the Spirit does the same thing with the Body of Christ at large. So, my answer to you is yes, in a qualified sense. I hope this doesn't muddle things too much!
Dr. Svigel,
You say "I don't see this as a promise that the Spirit will lead each individaul believer into fully understanding the proper interpretation of every verse of the Bible."
I hear many people today say that the Spirit leads them in making daily decisions. If I'm understanding you correctly, you would disagree with this. Is this correct? I just don't find the Scriptures telling us that the ministry of the Spirit is to give us decision making ability.
Jeffrey
That's getting into some difficult territory now. But I agree with you. When people say they feel led to do this or that, or that God put it on their heart to do such and such, I get uncomfortable. In making decisions (i.e., finding the will of God), I place subjective, individual, personal feelings (often interpreted as the internal move of the Spirit) at the bottom of my list of how to tell where God's leading. At the top of my list, of course, is the biblical mandate to glorify God in all that I do. I also place high up there the work of the Spirit in producing godly character traits---self-sacrificial love primarily. Then, as I work out detailed decisions, I place more confidence in the Spirit working through the community---wise counsel from mentors, leaders, friends, the church. Again, I want to emphasize that apart from the apostolic and prophetic offices, the Spirit primarily works through the Spirit-filled community. I don't reject the possibility that the Spirit can (and does) move and guide people individually in radical ways at times, but even in the Bible this is a miraculous exception to the general rule of the Spirit working through the community and through official means of counsel, wisdom, leadership, etc. So, I think you and I agree.
---Svigel
Hi, Michael,
Spirit empowered understanding is great, and we need to be in community with other Bible believers in submission to gifted teachers, no problem. But what if some teachers in some communities teach things that are substantially different (though not hetereodox) from teachers in other communities? Do we not veer off into theological relativism?
As an example with which you are familiar, community A says the Church and Israel are distinct, community B, says they're the same and community C says they're really the same but only different. How do I find the truth, or do I throw up my hands and say that these are trivial issues or endless theological debates? If so, then we could boil the Bible down to a few essential passages and relegate the rest to tradition-centric communities and either say that we can't really know the truth about such issues (because good men disagree) or agree in principle that some of us are right and others are wrong ... notwithstanding that we can be civil, patient and polite toward each other, some of the time, at least ;).
Vidbex:
Great questions/comments. I think first we need to acknowledge that there are a lot of issues that can find an unbroken tradition of near-unanimous confession by Christians, and I always like to begin there. It starts with a proper confession of Christ's person (the God-Man) and work (atoning death & resurrection), and affirms fundamental points about various aspects of theology. We do see these summarized in the early creeds. Later denominational confessions re-express the essential truths of these historical creeds, but do what you say---they expand on areas left undeveloped by the creeds. Defining the church, sanctification, the proper modes and candidates of baptism, etc. These would fall under the differing opinions you mention. In my understanding of community illumination, teachers are responsible for boldly affirming the central tenets of the faith as they center on Christ and the Triune God's gracious working in the world and then assigning some degree of charity and humility toward the other areas. I actually believe God has revealed truth that stands in tension---or that the resolution of such tension has not be revealed. This tension, I think, often leads to a man-made resolution where there should be either a maintained tension or silence. I don't mean that we shouldn't formulate a reasonable perspective on these issues to hold and to teach, but that when we do so we should be conscious of the central issues on which all Christian agree and also understand that the issues that divide us do so because they are not clearly revealed, or that the Spirit has not guided the church into a universally-accepted resolution yet. (He may never do so.) What I DO want to avoid with my "Be Taught . . . Be Stable" assertion is the opposite of community-motivated confidence and humility, and that's self-confident arrogance in affirming things as if from God that are really from one's own limited understanding.
Thanks, Mike, and BTW nice shot of the Leaning Tower of Pisa.
Thanks, Michael,
and BTS nice shot of the Leaning Tower of Pisa.
Post a Comment